Skip to content
Reportkey
SeoDocs Checklist SEO workspace · 2026-04-18
Comparison page | source-backed review

Reportkey vs SeoDocs: which platform to choose in 2026

If your report starts with completed SEO tasks and checklist proof rather than a wide set of paid, analytics, and call-tracking sources, SeoDocs remains a very clear choice. If you need a broader client-facing layer for SEO, ads, analytics, and AI-led summaries, Reportkey covers more recurring reporting jobs.

  • 30+ integrations
  • 14 days free trial
  • 5 min setup
SeoDocs and Reportkey solve neighboring but different problems. SeoDocs is stronger as a checklist-driven SEO reporting workspace. Reportkey is stronger as a broader client reporting layer for agencies that want multi-channel reporting, white-label delivery, and AI summaries in one client-facing flow.
Sample Reportkey client report with charts, metrics, and takeaways
Preview of a branded Reportkey client report
Summary verdict
Short verdict

SeoDocs and Reportkey solve neighboring but different problems. SeoDocs is stronger as a checklist-driven SEO reporting workspace. Reportkey is stronger as a broader client reporting layer for agencies that want multi-channel reporting, white-label delivery, and AI summaries in one client-facing flow.

30+
integrations
14 days
free trial
5 min
setup
Evaluation context

This comparison separates completed-work reporting from recurring client KPI delivery. SeoDocs should be evaluated as a checklist-style SEO reporting workspace: it helps explain what work was completed and may be stronger when the client primarily buys SEO worklog transparency. Reportkey does not need to replace that layer one-for-one; it is more relevant when the client needs one branded report across SEO, paid media, analytics, and call-tracking with AI summaries. The page uses public materials and the freshness date shown here, so pricing, trial limits, branding rules, and custom-domain conditions should be rechecked before rollout. A pilot should decide what is mandatory: a completed-work list, KPI narrative, multi-channel delivery, or a deliberate combination of those layers.

Summary verdict

Short verdict

SeoDocs and Reportkey solve neighboring but different problems. SeoDocs is stronger as a checklist-driven SEO reporting workspace. Reportkey is stronger as a broader client reporting layer for agencies that want multi-channel reporting, white-label delivery, and AI summaries in one client-facing flow.

SeoDocs
Where SeoDocs is stronger

If your team sells not just outcomes but also transparency around completed SEO work, SeoDocs reflects that process better.

Reportkey
Where Reportkey wins

Reportkey is designed not only for SEO storytelling but also for ads, analytics, and call-tracking in one client-ready report.

Feature matrix

Feature-by-feature view

Use the matrix to compare delivery model, proof depth, automation posture, and evaluation friction side by side.

Criterion Reportkey SeoDocs Takeaway
Primary focus A client-facing marketing reporting layer across SEO, ads, analytics, and related channels. Checklist-first SEO reporting centered on completed work, task proof, and the next reporting period. If the main value is showing what the SEO team actually did, SeoDocs is often closer to the job.
Integrations and data sources 30+ integrations in the current public proof set. The reviewed public pages explicitly document Yandex.Metrika, Topvisor, and Toolzar. Reportkey is much broader as a multi-source layer, while SeoDocs stays closer to a focused SEO workflow.
White-label and branding White-label branding is part of the public positioning; custom domain is a higher-tier configuration path. Branding is described as available on all tariffs. If branded delivery on an entry plan matters most, SeoDocs currently states that more directly.
AI summaries AI report summaries are part of the current public positioning. AI summaries were not clearly documented; the core story is checklist workflow instead. Reportkey is stronger when you want automated executive context at the top of the report.
Scheduling and recurring workflows Scheduled generation appears in higher-tier positioning. The reviewed public pages do not provide equally explicit wording around scheduled sending. If recurring send flow is a standalone criterion, Reportkey is easier to justify from current public messaging.
Export and delivery model Stronger in branded client delivery and in the overall client-ready reporting narrative. PDF and HTML outputs are documented on official pages. SeoDocs is easier to evaluate if you want a straightforward SEO reporting workflow in PDF or HTML without a wider multi-channel promise.
Entry pricing From RUB 1,412/month on current public pricing. From RUB 500/month on public pricing. SeoDocs is much cheaper at the public entry point.
Trial and evaluation path 14 days free. A 14-day trial exists, but it is limited to one project and one reporting period. Both products are easy to test, but the SeoDocs trial is more limited in usage scope.
API and automation A public API exists; entitlement depends on plan and add-ons. A public API was not clearly documented on the reviewed pages. If workflow automation matters, Reportkey is better prepared for technical evaluation.
Depth of SEO worklog storytelling Stronger in data-driven client reporting across channels. Stronger in showing completed SEO work, checklists, and next-step planning. SeoDocs wins when the client expects explicit SEO work proof rather than aggregated reporting alone.

Primary focus

Reportkey A client-facing marketing reporting layer across SEO, ads, analytics, and related channels.
SeoDocs Checklist-first SEO reporting centered on completed work, task proof, and the next reporting period.
Takeaway If the main value is showing what the SEO team actually did, SeoDocs is often closer to the job.

Integrations and data sources

Reportkey 30+ integrations in the current public proof set.
SeoDocs The reviewed public pages explicitly document Yandex.Metrika, Topvisor, and Toolzar.
Takeaway Reportkey is much broader as a multi-source layer, while SeoDocs stays closer to a focused SEO workflow.

White-label and branding

Reportkey White-label branding is part of the public positioning; custom domain is a higher-tier configuration path.
SeoDocs Branding is described as available on all tariffs.
Takeaway If branded delivery on an entry plan matters most, SeoDocs currently states that more directly.

AI summaries

Reportkey AI report summaries are part of the current public positioning.
SeoDocs AI summaries were not clearly documented; the core story is checklist workflow instead.
Takeaway Reportkey is stronger when you want automated executive context at the top of the report.

Scheduling and recurring workflows

Reportkey Scheduled generation appears in higher-tier positioning.
SeoDocs The reviewed public pages do not provide equally explicit wording around scheduled sending.
Takeaway If recurring send flow is a standalone criterion, Reportkey is easier to justify from current public messaging.

Export and delivery model

Reportkey Stronger in branded client delivery and in the overall client-ready reporting narrative.
SeoDocs PDF and HTML outputs are documented on official pages.
Takeaway SeoDocs is easier to evaluate if you want a straightforward SEO reporting workflow in PDF or HTML without a wider multi-channel promise.

Entry pricing

Reportkey From RUB 1,412/month on current public pricing.
SeoDocs From RUB 500/month on public pricing.
Takeaway SeoDocs is much cheaper at the public entry point.

Trial and evaluation path

Reportkey 14 days free.
SeoDocs A 14-day trial exists, but it is limited to one project and one reporting period.
Takeaway Both products are easy to test, but the SeoDocs trial is more limited in usage scope.

API and automation

Reportkey A public API exists; entitlement depends on plan and add-ons.
SeoDocs A public API was not clearly documented on the reviewed pages.
Takeaway If workflow automation matters, Reportkey is better prepared for technical evaluation.

Depth of SEO worklog storytelling

Reportkey Stronger in data-driven client reporting across channels.
SeoDocs Stronger in showing completed SEO work, checklists, and next-step planning.
Takeaway SeoDocs wins when the client expects explicit SEO work proof rather than aggregated reporting alone.
Decision guide

Where each side is stronger

Both sides are described intentionally honestly. The page should support a real evaluation, not act like an attack page.

SeoDocs

Where SeoDocs is stronger

Checklist-first reporting logic

If your team sells not just outcomes but also transparency around completed SEO work, SeoDocs reflects that process better.

Lower starting price

The public entry point is lower, which makes SeoDocs easier to justify for a small SEO team.

Branding is stated across all plans

That part of the SeoDocs messaging is straightforward and does not depend on the higher-tier qualifiers visible in Reportkey.

Reportkey

Where Reportkey wins

Broader multi-channel reporting scope

Reportkey is designed not only for SEO storytelling but also for ads, analytics, and call-tracking in one client-ready report.

AI summary layer

When the report needs an executive layer on top instead of task proof only, Reportkey offers a clearer AI-led use case.

Better base for automation and future integrations

The public API and 30+ integrations make Reportkey a more scalable choice for agencies that will outgrow a single checklist workflow.

Migration

Moving from SeoDocs?

Do not start by shutting down the existing workflow. First decide which parts of the current value proposition truly need to move: completed-work storytelling, KPI reporting, or both.

1
Separate worklog from KPI delivery
Identify which parts of the report explain completed actions and which parts communicate measurable outcomes.
2
Build a pilot report for one client
Validate whether a data-driven narrative is enough or whether a checklist layer still needs to exist in a parallel process.
3
Add sections in phases
Move recurring KPI delivery first, then decide whether a separate worklog communication layer still adds value.
FAQ

FAQ

Use these questions as a pre-pilot checklist before you move a live client workflow.

Who should choose SeoDocs and who should choose Reportkey?
SeoDocs is a better fit when the report's core value is visibility into completed SEO tasks and checklists. Reportkey is stronger when the client needs one report across multiple channels with white-label delivery and AI summaries. In Reportkey, this scenario is tied to Reportkey vs SeoDocs, 30+ integrations, and recurring client reporting.
Can Reportkey replace SeoDocs without losing transparency?
Reportkey can replace SeoDocs only when the client does not require checklist-style SEO work transparency. If the client mainly buys KPI reporting, Reportkey may fit better. If the client expects a checklist-style narrative of completed SEO work, replacing SeoDocs one-for-one may not be the right move.
How do pricing and trial compare?
Reportkey and SeoDocs pricing and trial terms should be compared against the official public pages checked on the review date. SeoDocs is cheaper at the public entry point. Both products are easy to test, but the SeoDocs trial is limited to one project and one reporting period.
Which one is better for branding?
Reportkey and SeoDocs both had a branded delivery angle on the review date, but in different forms. SeoDocs states branding across all tariffs. Reportkey makes white-label part of its public positioning, while custom-domain delivery is tied to higher-tier conditions.
How do I compare products with such different focus honestly?
Reportkey and SeoDocs should be compared by what the client is buying, not by counting feature checkmarks alone. If the client pays for transparency around SEO worklog, SeoDocs can be stronger. If the client expects one client-ready report across channels with AI summaries, Reportkey is the better fit.
Disclosure

Disclosure

SeoDocs facts were checked against official public pages on 2026-04-18. We are not affiliated with SeoDocs. If pricing, branding rules, or documented integrations changed after that date, defer to the vendor's current official materials.

Last reviewed: 2026-04-18

Independent review source: Startpack

Need to test the real client-ready flow?

Compare the workflow, not just the copy

Build one pilot report in Reportkey and see whether the format matches what your clients actually expect.

Start for free
Start for free