SeoDocs and Reportkey solve neighboring but different problems. SeoDocs is stronger as a checklist-driven SEO reporting workspace. Reportkey is stronger as a broader client reporting layer for agencies that want multi-channel reporting, white-label delivery, and AI summaries in one client-facing flow.
Reportkey vs SeoDocs: which platform to choose in 2026
If your report starts with completed SEO tasks and checklist proof rather than a wide set of paid, analytics, and call-tracking sources, SeoDocs remains a very clear choice. If you need a broader client-facing layer for SEO, ads, analytics, and AI-led summaries, Reportkey covers more recurring reporting jobs.
- 30+ integrations
- 14 days free trial
- 5 min setup

This comparison separates completed-work reporting from recurring client KPI delivery. SeoDocs should be evaluated as a checklist-style SEO reporting workspace: it helps explain what work was completed and may be stronger when the client primarily buys SEO worklog transparency. Reportkey does not need to replace that layer one-for-one; it is more relevant when the client needs one branded report across SEO, paid media, analytics, and call-tracking with AI summaries. The page uses public materials and the freshness date shown here, so pricing, trial limits, branding rules, and custom-domain conditions should be rechecked before rollout. A pilot should decide what is mandatory: a completed-work list, KPI narrative, multi-channel delivery, or a deliberate combination of those layers.
Short verdict
SeoDocs and Reportkey solve neighboring but different problems. SeoDocs is stronger as a checklist-driven SEO reporting workspace. Reportkey is stronger as a broader client reporting layer for agencies that want multi-channel reporting, white-label delivery, and AI summaries in one client-facing flow.
If your team sells not just outcomes but also transparency around completed SEO work, SeoDocs reflects that process better.
Reportkey is designed not only for SEO storytelling but also for ads, analytics, and call-tracking in one client-ready report.
Feature-by-feature view
Use the matrix to compare delivery model, proof depth, automation posture, and evaluation friction side by side.
| Criterion | Reportkey | SeoDocs | Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | A client-facing marketing reporting layer across SEO, ads, analytics, and related channels. | Checklist-first SEO reporting centered on completed work, task proof, and the next reporting period. | If the main value is showing what the SEO team actually did, SeoDocs is often closer to the job. |
| Integrations and data sources | 30+ integrations in the current public proof set. | The reviewed public pages explicitly document Yandex.Metrika, Topvisor, and Toolzar. | Reportkey is much broader as a multi-source layer, while SeoDocs stays closer to a focused SEO workflow. |
| White-label and branding | White-label branding is part of the public positioning; custom domain is a higher-tier configuration path. | Branding is described as available on all tariffs. | If branded delivery on an entry plan matters most, SeoDocs currently states that more directly. |
| AI summaries | AI report summaries are part of the current public positioning. | AI summaries were not clearly documented; the core story is checklist workflow instead. | Reportkey is stronger when you want automated executive context at the top of the report. |
| Scheduling and recurring workflows | Scheduled generation appears in higher-tier positioning. | The reviewed public pages do not provide equally explicit wording around scheduled sending. | If recurring send flow is a standalone criterion, Reportkey is easier to justify from current public messaging. |
| Export and delivery model | Stronger in branded client delivery and in the overall client-ready reporting narrative. | PDF and HTML outputs are documented on official pages. | SeoDocs is easier to evaluate if you want a straightforward SEO reporting workflow in PDF or HTML without a wider multi-channel promise. |
| Entry pricing | From RUB 1,412/month on current public pricing. | From RUB 500/month on public pricing. | SeoDocs is much cheaper at the public entry point. |
| Trial and evaluation path | 14 days free. | A 14-day trial exists, but it is limited to one project and one reporting period. | Both products are easy to test, but the SeoDocs trial is more limited in usage scope. |
| API and automation | A public API exists; entitlement depends on plan and add-ons. | A public API was not clearly documented on the reviewed pages. | If workflow automation matters, Reportkey is better prepared for technical evaluation. |
| Depth of SEO worklog storytelling | Stronger in data-driven client reporting across channels. | Stronger in showing completed SEO work, checklists, and next-step planning. | SeoDocs wins when the client expects explicit SEO work proof rather than aggregated reporting alone. |
Primary focus
Integrations and data sources
White-label and branding
AI summaries
Scheduling and recurring workflows
Export and delivery model
Entry pricing
Trial and evaluation path
API and automation
Depth of SEO worklog storytelling
Where each side is stronger
Both sides are described intentionally honestly. The page should support a real evaluation, not act like an attack page.
Where SeoDocs is stronger
If your team sells not just outcomes but also transparency around completed SEO work, SeoDocs reflects that process better.
The public entry point is lower, which makes SeoDocs easier to justify for a small SEO team.
That part of the SeoDocs messaging is straightforward and does not depend on the higher-tier qualifiers visible in Reportkey.
Where Reportkey wins
Reportkey is designed not only for SEO storytelling but also for ads, analytics, and call-tracking in one client-ready report.
When the report needs an executive layer on top instead of task proof only, Reportkey offers a clearer AI-led use case.
The public API and 30+ integrations make Reportkey a more scalable choice for agencies that will outgrow a single checklist workflow.
Moving from SeoDocs?
Do not start by shutting down the existing workflow. First decide which parts of the current value proposition truly need to move: completed-work storytelling, KPI reporting, or both.
FAQ
Use these questions as a pre-pilot checklist before you move a live client workflow.
Who should choose SeoDocs and who should choose Reportkey?
Can Reportkey replace SeoDocs without losing transparency?
How do pricing and trial compare?
Which one is better for branding?
How do I compare products with such different focus honestly?
Disclosure
SeoDocs facts were checked against official public pages on 2026-04-18. We are not affiliated with SeoDocs. If pricing, branding rules, or documented integrations changed after that date, defer to the vendor's current official materials.
Compare the workflow, not just the copy
Build one pilot report in Reportkey and see whether the format matches what your clients actually expect.